Record of our discussion
Community busS I thought that "investment by stores" is good. Shops can make profits and users can go to convenient places. I felt that the interests were consistent.
F I agree.
C I think that it is equally good as there is also a company's interest that it can appeal CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) by investing in community bus.
K I agree with "funded by a store", but I think that it can be included as a candidate because the "local residents led type" is also similar for the part to be improved.
Y I think that it is better to include shops than to complete within the municipality.
F I think that it is good to utilize a school bus.
Y Can a school bus correspond only in the morning and the evening?
F Well, it might be better to combine the school bus and the plan of the shop.
C In other words, do you mean that you have to adopt a school bus in the morning and evening, and a store plan in the day?
C Certainly it would be nice to be able to respond to what Y is concerned about.
K Why is it biased not only by the merit of the operation by the shop, but there are two solutions such as management by the store and management by the residents?
C・F Because I think that it is good to operate with the premise that it is close to the residents.
K What do you think about other items?
F I do not think there is no choice not to do about route change.
K Indeed, is it uniformly organized like this?
C But it would be nice to have a school bus operation base as a shop but how do I get to the school bus ride?
S Is not it supplemented with a community bus?
F For example, it may be that you have a bus stop that makes a shop one bus terminal and run from there like a shuttle bus towards a residential area.
C There are examples of failures like the “Fujimi-go” issue, but what should be the problem in terms of convenience?
F Is it to make a route connecting the shop and the station and a line connecting the shop and the residential area and supplementing the missing part with the demand traffic?
K It seems that you will be using everything as it is, so why can not you erase the part to be covered first?
C Well, already it is a policy to fuse together the fusion and summarize them all at once?
Y So, first of all, is it okay for local governments to do their best as a prerequisite for changing the route.
F Regarding the base of operation, I think that it is good to form a route to each residential area so that it is derived from the shops in the center.
K In other words, is it not necessary to go around with a single bus, but can we have more than one straight line?
F Oh yeah, there are some routes.
C What about demand type?
Public busC Since it is not possible to sustain spinning, it is better not to do anything in the first place because there is a fear of not being improved even if it is made into a spin off company.
S I think that it would be better to stop dividing the company because it will lead to deterioration of the working environment. Although loading with passengers seems to have some disadvantages, it seems to be still better in this, and I thought that it would be good to apply the subsidy of the municipality to the loading of passengers. Also, I did not know how effective it is so that subsidies are "temporary".
Y Originally it was after all the disadvantages of loading of passengers?
K There are various explanations for loading of passengers, but there are not many demerits.
Y That's right, there is no disadvantage like that, but it is a lack of feasibility.
C How about the municipality doing the initial investment of loading of passengers?
S Yes, I'd like to temporarily go through subsidies and close off as management improves.
S In conclusion, only to use the subsidy successfully.
C Yes, I agree.
K Since we only apply for subsidies without changing anything, the current problem is causing problems, and if we decide it is only initial investment, we may be able to keep it down.
S Is it a solution to make strict criteria?
F The criteria are strictly set at the present moment but the examination has not been frequently done. Also, do not leave it carefully to take care of you.
C It is also a problem that there is a difference in interpretation to standards.
K What should we do as a conclusion?
C Because loading of passengers can not be done without a sales office, it does not apply to any area, right?
F Do you change the fundamental transportation system and make it possible without a sales office?
K Well, however, if it was the previous story, there may be a conclusion that subsidies that clarified the purpose are important, as was the subsidy from the municipalities to realize the loading of passengers.
F The point is that instead of relying on subsidies, we conclude that it is essential to address the steady management improvement of the bus company side.
RailwayF First of all, I think it is unlikely that we will fail in tourism. It is because it is difficult to think that it will end halfway because it can only be done with gold in the first place and proactive investment can be expected. Also, because tourism is more aggressive than rationalization that is negative, it is one of the reasons that it is directly involved in the increase in customers. In addition, I find that it is very good remedial measures because it also shows that there are very few examples that the Tourism Division failed as a result of examination.
K For tourism, I agree with that opinion and I personally want to pay attention to two points where the target places of subjects such as bus conversion and short formation high frequency operation are almost the same. As for my opinion on this, I think that it is better to run a short organization high-frequency operation that can be realized simply by dividing an existing car body.
Y It is true, but it is a matter of doing bus transformation against the state line that there is no prospect of making any profit any more, so is there a problem as to whether there is a prospect of the customer or not?
K If so, how do you reduce expenses by adopting short organization only? As you can see in the example, I think that it is not necessary to combine short formation and high frequency.
Y In the case of Japan now, it is done separately from the bus conversion, short-organized high-frequency driving is done if there is a railway route and there is an opinion that the residents of that route are inconvenient, whereas bus It is quite different as it is to be done in a state where there are few people who already use the conversion anymore ...
C But the current situation is that it is more like thinking that it is more convenient for the bus to convert to a salad than for a train, rather than for a bus conversion being done without any effort, so it is quite easy to think about it. There is also.
F Indeed, municipalities do the roads and maintenance costs are cheap.
C What do you think of the “third sector”?
Y Since there are many cases that things that were originally unlikely to be thrown in, there are quite a lot of risks. However, it is better to understand that there are cases in which it is not uncommon, like the Sanriku Railway of "Ama-chan" or the light rail of Toyama.
F In the case of Toyama, short-formation frequent high-frequency operation, in the case of Sanriku railway, like tourism, even if it is made into the third sector, it should establish management improvement measures of either short-formation rear wheel driving or tourism section.
C Certainly, not only the third sector, but also something like change in tourism or short formation high frequency driving must accompany it.
Y However, it should be considered that the successful formation of light rail in Toyama is not such a thing as can be realized so easily. If you are going to make it from scratch, you need to do it from where you draw a new track.
F In other words, after all it is impossible to try to make light rail in an area where traffic refugees are going out because I can not approve the use of local residents after all, I think that tourism is easier to adopt.
K But why can not you do anything with sightseeing?
Y As for that, not only the topographical thing but also the hand that makes the car body itself touristic.
F Especially personally I think that full tourism like Izu Hakone is good. In addition to using a considerable sightseeing spot such as a hot spring place, I think that it is good that we also do tourism for geeks by running anime elements called love live and old cars and their restored vehicles. Also, I think Fujikyu and Kawaguchiko that I wrote on the site are also pretty good examples.
C It is OK to do so if you can combine cargo as well as bus. If you can realize by using the power supply inside the car in a room where there is a cool flight, it will lead to considerable cost savings.